Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. O'Hara v. Appling
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1959PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto brought to determine who is entitled to hold the office of Secretary of State of the State of Oregon. We took jurisdiction pursuant to amended Art VII, § 2, Constitution of Oregon, because of the public importance of the question and the necessity for its speedy final determination.
The case is before v. on motion of the defendants for judgment on the pleadings. The complaint was filed by the state on the relation of David O’Hara on the information of Hattie Bratzel, District Attorney of Marion county, and Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Badger v. United States Ex Rel. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State ex rel. Everding v. SimonOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Brown v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Nesbitt v. AppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Pense v. McCallOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Musa v. MinearOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- STATE, EX REL. ADAMS v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.