Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Butera v. Lombardi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1959PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.
Tn this proceeding, in the nature of quo warranto, Evo Butera, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, seeks to test the right of the defendant to occupy the office of assessor of the city and town of Danbury. The facts are not in dispute. Special Acts 1935, No. 327, § 1, provides that the members of the board of finance of the town of Dan-bury, the members of the board of estimate and taxation of the city of Danbury, the mayor of the city and the first selectman of the town shall con stitute a joint tax board for certain defined purposes, among which is the appointment of an assessor by a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- The People Ex Rel. v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Forman Schools, Inc. v. Town of LitchfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- People ex rel. Myers v. HaasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stolberg v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Irving Stolberg v. Members of the Board of Trustees for the State Colleges of the State Ofconnecticut, AndCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Little v. United National Investors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Skorpios Properties, Ltd. v. WaageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- C. White & Son, Inc. v. Town of Rocky HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.