Shriner v. Rausch
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*230SCHROEDER, Chief Justice.
This case is on appeal from the January 30, 2004, order of the Industrial Commission (Commission) determining that Rudolph Shriner (Shriner) was an independent contractor when he performed work for Ron Rausch (Rausch) and, consequently, not a covered employee for workers’ compensation purposes. Shriner appeals.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Rausch is a real estate agent who owns and manages various properties for rent to tenants. Rausch frequently entered into partnership-type arrangements with E & H Construction (E & H) in which E & H would act as a general…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Ledesma v. BergesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Painter v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Dewey v. MerrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Mortimer v. Riviera ApartmentsIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Fuhriman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Herrera v. EstayIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Moore v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Smith v. Excel Fabrication, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.