Legal Opinion

State v. Ritter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 1984No. C 82-10-37942; CA A28652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, contending that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress certain evidence seized pursuant to a warrantless entry of his hotel room. Because we conclude that the entry was based on probable cause and justified by exigent circumstances and practical necessity, we affirm.

On October 17, 1982, Officer Bunnell of the Multnomah County Sheriffs Department received information from a special agent of the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration that defendant was expected to arrive in Oregon by plane with a large quantity of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. Morrison/BarteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. HeikkinenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. JangalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API