Legal Opinion

State v. Jangala

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1998No. V16-2046; CA A97030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The state appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrant-less search at a beer party. The state argues that the warrantless search was supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances. We agree and reverse.

Although we are bound by the trial court’s finding of historical facts when they are supported by the record, we review independently the court’s legal conclusions that are based on those facts. See State v. Stevens, 311 Or 119, 126, 806 P2d 92 (1991). In its memorandum opinion, the court set forth the following facts. On September 27,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. HeikkinenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steven Radloff v. City of Oelwein, Iowa Jesse Paul John Reege and Curt WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Howes v. HitchcockDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  3. Radloff v. City of OelweinDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  4. Steven Radloff v. Oelwein, IACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API