Legal Opinion
Kittok v. Leslie's Poolmart, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 4, 2009No. Case No. EDCV 08-832 (OPx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge.
On July 6, 2009, the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Mary Jo Kittok (“plaintiff’ or “Kittok”) on one of her disability access claims brought against defendant Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc. (“defendant” or “Leslie’s”), and dismissed her other claims. Plaintiff now brings the instant motion for attorneys’ fees, as authorized by Cal. Civil Code § 54.3. The Court held a hearing on the motion on August 10, 2009.
For the reasons set forth below and consistent with the modification described,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lugo v. 141 NW 20th Street Holdings, LLC, Plum Park, II, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Calcano v. Cole Haan LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Meyer v. MittalDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Miguel Ibarra v. Navient Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019