Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Mittal
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 28, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00621Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JASON MEYER, an individual; No. 3:21-cv-00621-HZ ARGIL DX LLC f/k/a ZAP TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC, a OPINION & ORDER Nevada limited liability company; and ARGIL DX, putative partnership, Plaintiffs, v. ANKUR MITTAL, an individual; AXENO CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ARGILDX CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ACCUNITY SOFTWARE PVT. LTD., an Indian private company; and ADX CONSULTING INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants. Adam D. Rose Eric C. Lang Rose Law Firm, P.C. 5200 Meadows Rd, Ste 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sara…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Grissom v. the Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.