Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Austin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1983No. WD33101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

The parties own neighboring properties, and defendants’ driveway encroaches on the land to which plaintiffs own record title. Plaintiffs sued to quiet title, to which defendants counterclaimed in two counts. Count I of the counterclaim sought to establish a prescriptive easement in the driveway encroachment by reason of adverse use for more than ten years; while Count II sought to establish adverse possession to that encroachment. Each count of the counterclaim was tried at different times in two different courts and to two different juries, but both trials…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bugner v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Ferguson v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Dennison v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  4. Cary v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. City of Seattle v. MoellerWashington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ortmann v. Dace Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Pugatch v. StoloffMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. HolloranMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Dorner v. WishonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API