Pugatch v. Stoloff
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
This is a boundary dispute between the owners of two lots in Newton which, although fronting on different streets, share a common rear lot line. A judge in the Superior Court dismissed Pugatch’s contract claim as well as the Stoloffs’ claim to have acquired a substantial part of Pu-gatch’s lot by adverse possession. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The two lots were held in common ownership as a single lot by the plaintiff’s mother prior to June 27, 1969. The lot was rectangular, fronted on Sun Hill Lane, and had a house, which the Stoloffs now own, at the Sun Hill Lane end of the lot.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kendall v. SelvaggioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Proprietors of the Kennebeck Purchase v. SpringerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Ottavia v. SavareseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Kershaw v. ZecchiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Dow v. DowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barnett v. MyerowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Gifford v. OtisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- 243 Colchester Ave v. OconnorVermont Superior Court · 2025
- AM Properties, LLC v. J&W Summit Ave, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Clauson v. BanksMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.