Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Moeller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1913No. 10286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered February 6, 1912, in favor of the defendant, vacating an assessment roll for a local improvement, after a trial on the merits before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This is an appeal by the city of Seattle from a judgment of the superior court of King county, setting aside an assessment roll for local improvement district No. 2,497, for the improvement of Twenty-second avenue southwest.

The property within the confines of the district is owned by William Moeller, the Coryell Investment Company, a corporation, and the Westerman Iron Works, a corporation. There was exempted and excepted from the assessment roll a strip of land sixty feet wide extending across the entire width of the district. The sole question involved in this appeal is whether this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shellhouse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Shell v. PoulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Jones v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Primark, Inc. v. Burien Gardens AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. City of Seattle v. AbrahamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Pierce v. AustinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Wheeler v. RendslandWashington Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API