Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Hickey-Freeman, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 30, 2001No. 98 Civ. 8661(JES)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Barry Kramer (“Mr. Kramer” or “plaintiff’) brings this action against his former employer, defendant Hickey-Freeman, Inc.(“Hickey-Freeman” or “defendant”) alleging disability discrimination against plaintiff in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), denial of unpaid leave in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendant now moves for summary judgment against plaintiff pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Robert N. Colwell, Charles R. Ellinger and Richard H. Abrams, Jr. v. Suffolk County Police Department, County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Jessica Ryan v. Grae & Rybicki, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Price v. Mount Sinai HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Ramirez v. New York City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Graham v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- ROMAN-MARTINEZ v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008