Legal Opinion

People v. Ziglar

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 25, 2002No. 01SC193PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals erred in remanding Daryl Ziglar's conviction as a habitual criminal on the grounds that the trial court gave an incorrect Curtis advisement during the sentencing hearing. People v. Ziglar, No. 98CA2214, slip op. at 18 (Colo.App. Dec. 14, 2000) (not selected for official publication). We now conclude that the trial court's advisement, although unnecessary, was not in error because a defendant's admissions during the sentencing phase may serve as substantive evidence of the existence of prior felonies. We therefore reverse the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. State v. HartsoughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WelshColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Moore v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. People v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. EmertColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Peo v. FletcherColorado Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API