Legal Opinion
City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 24, 2001No. SC 16243PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The issue raised in this joint appeal from 111 separate judgments of strict foreclosure is whether the trial court, on remand from this court; Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp., 249 Conn. 1, 31, 730 A.2d 1129 (1999); properly awarded sheriffs fees where the party requesting those fees failed to present any evidence to support its request. The defen*50dant Philbury, Inc. (Philbury), appeals1 from the judgments of the trial court awarding sheriffs fees to the plaintiff2 totaling $164,000. On appeal, Philbury claims that the award of sheriffs fees should be vacated because the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- City of Danbury v. Dana Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Somers v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Beach v. Milford Ice Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Ottaviani v. PechiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- LePage v. HorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- St. Onge, Stewart, Johnson & Reens, LLC v. Media Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- City of Norwalk v. FarrellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Fox v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Weekley v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.