Fox v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
These three zoning appeals arise from a reconfiguration by Marjorie Hart and Peter Hart of *630an existing, nonconforming retail lumber business to replace a structure that had been destroyed by fire on property in the town of Barkhamsted (town). As to the appeals designated AC 24501 and AC 24502, we do not reach the substantive issues raised by the parties; instead, we conclude that the trial court improperly found that Kathleen B. Fox, an allegedly abutting property owner, was statutorily aggrieved. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the case with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- McNally v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pond View, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Watertown, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Rainbow Housing Corp. v. CromwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Rya Corp. V. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Connelly v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.