Legal Opinion
Ottaviani v. Pechi
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 25, 1988No. 6248PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The named defendant1 appeals from the judgment rendered, after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs. The appeal presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether the court erred in awarding the plaintiffs prejudgment interest under General Statutes § 37-3a; (2) whether the court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs; and (3) whether the court erred in disallowing the defendant’s counterclaim. We find no error.
The trial court found the following facts. On July 10, 1985, the plaintiffs, Guido and Barbara Ottaviani, entered into a contract with the defendant for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Noethe v. NoetheConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Alderman v. RPM of New Haven, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- In Re RubensteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Bucy v. BucyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.