Legal Opinion

State v. Hoskins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1978No. 777SC770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the action of the trial court in admonishing both the prosecutor and defense counsel during voir dire for their lack of cooperation with each other and the court. Out of the presence of the jury, the trial court specifically warned both of them that, upon future bantering or failure to abide by the court’s instructions, either or both would be held in contempt and jailed. The trial court also indicated that, if necessary, a mistrial would be declared.

Every person charged with a crime has a right to trial before an impartial judge and an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. D. D. H. v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. BradsherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API