Legal Opinion

State v. Bradsher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1980No. 8015SC547PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss based upon the failure of the bill of indictment properly to charge the offense of armed robbery. Specifically, defendant argues that the indictment did not sufficiently “designate the address or location of premises where alleged acts referred to occurred.” We do not agree. The indictment plainly states that personal property “of the said T.K. Wilkinson” was taken “from the presence, and residence of T.K. Wilkinson, 308 North Third Street, Mebane, N.C.” Furthermore, we have carefully examined…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. SledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. QuilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. LetterloughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API