Film Packages, Inc. v. Brandywine Film Productions, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLE, J. *
The simple question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court may properly entertain and grant a second application by a plaintiff for a right to attach order, absent a showing of any facts materially different from those presented on a prior denied application. We hold that such an application may be entertained by the court.
On January 7, 1985, the first application for a right to attach order made by plaintiff and respondent Film Packages, Inc. (Film Packages or respondent) was denied. The court found that Film Packages had failed to establish the probable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Strick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kenney v. KelleherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Murillo v. TooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Corcoran v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- New York Times Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Stephen v. Enterprise Rent-A-CarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Deauville Restaurant, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.