Legal Opinion

EMCASCO Insurance Company v. Van Dyken Drilling, Inc.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided July 23, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00062Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION EMCASCO INSURANCE COMPANY AND EMPLOYERS CV-23-62-BU-JTJ MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. VAN DYKEN DRILLING, INC., Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs EMCASCO Ins. Co. and Employers Mutual Casualty Co. (collectively EMC) have filed a declaratory judgment action against Defendant Van Dyken Drilling, Inc. (Van Dyken). EMC seeks a declaration that they have no duty to defend or indemnify Van Dyken in an action that is pending in Montana’s Eighteenth Judicial District Court (Underlying…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Staples v. FARMERS UNION MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Giacomelli v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API