Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. Bargala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 31, 1998No. 96-36254PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Senior Circuit Judge:
John L. Corrigan, Jr., (“Corrigan”) appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion to extend time to appeal from the order dismissing his complaint, and from the denial of his motion for reconsideration of that order. Corrigan contends that his motion to extend the time to file an appeal under Rule 4(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure should have been granted because his failure to notify the proper court of a change in his address constituted “excusable neglect.” Corrigan further contends that the district court should have remanded…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McCalden v. California Library Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Al-Hakim Allah v. Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County, R.A. Doeve, Real-Parties-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- R.F. Vernon v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc., Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Brown v. Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Ford v. Mci Communications Corporation Health And Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- American Ironworks & Erectors Inc. v. North American Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.