Legal Opinion
Brown v. Fifth Third Bank
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 12, 2013No. 13-1781PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Before me is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal as untimely. The motion was referred to me because I was motions judge (a position that rotates among the judges) when the motion was filed.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 requires that a judgment by a district court be set forth in a separate document. If it is not, then judgment is deemed to be entered 150 days after the court’s final decision, Fed.R.Civ.P. 58(c)(2)(B); see also Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(7)(A)(ii)—in which event the appeal in this case is timely; otherwise it is not. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts has…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- William Hope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- William F. Grun v. Pneumo Abex Corp., Pa Holdings Corp., and the Henley Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Richard C. Fiore v. Washington County Community Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Zinovy v. Reytblatt v. Harold B. DentonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sanchez v. RodriguezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Hiob v. Progressive American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Selective Insurance Company of v. City of ParisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Tuwayne Bell v. Supervisor KayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Michael Houston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.