Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2000No. Nos. 98-36081, 98-36083, 98-36086, 98-36089, 98-36091, 98-36093, 98-36108, 98-36109, 98-36205 and 99-35046PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a bankruptcy court may order substantive consolidation of two non-debtor corporations, World Plus, Inc. and Atlantic Pacific Funding Corporation, with the bankruptcy estate of Chapter 7 debtor Raejean Bonham nunc pro tunc as of the filing date of the involuntary Chapter 7 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we reverse the decision of the district court and remand with instructions to affirm the bankruptcy court’s order of nunc pro tunc substantive consolidation.

*759I

This appeal arises out of a failed Ponzi scheme1…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. In Re Bonner Mall Partnership, Debtor. Bonner Mall Partnership v. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In re Owens CorningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Slatkin v. NeilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Verestar, Inc. v. American Tower Corp. (In Re Verestar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Eden Place v. Sholem PerlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. In re City of Desert Hot SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API