Salinas v. Texas
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner's interview with the police lasted approximately one hour. All agree that the interview was noncustodial, and the parties litigated this case on the assumption that he was not read Miranda warnings. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). For most of the interview, petitioner answered the officer's questions. But when asked whether his shotgun "would match the shells recovered at the scene of the murder," App. 17, petitioner declined to answer. Instead, petitioner "[l]ooked down at the floor, shuffled his feet, bit his bottom lip, cl[e]nched…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by224 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Jessie DotsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Leo Abby v. Carol HoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Molina, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.