Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Molina, M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 2014No. 25 WAP 2012PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Justice BAER.

We granted review in this case to consider whether a defendant’s right against self-incrimination, as protected by the federal and Pennsylvania constitutions, is violated when the prosecution utilizes a non-testifying defendant’s pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence of guilt. After reviewing this issue of first impression, to which the United States Supreme Court has not definitively spoken, we agree with the Superior Court, as well as several of our sister courts, that the use of pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence of…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarnettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. Adams, S., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. State of Florida v. Donna HorwitzSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. State v. HaynesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
  5. JOHN URBANIAK v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API