Legal Opinion
Honolulu Weekly Inc. v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2002No. Nos. 01-15854, 01-15992PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether a City and County of Honolulu ordinance violates the First Amendment or the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution or the corresponding provisions of the Hawaii Constitution. The ordinance requires all publishers who wish to distribute their publications along sidewalks in the Waikiki Special District to use one of two sets of newsracks — one reserved solely for publications that charge readers and one just for free publications. We hold that the ordinance is constitutional We therefore reverse the partial summary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Osu Student Alliance v. Ed RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Marilyn Scheer v. Patrick KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Wright v. Incline Village General Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.