Marilyn Scheer v. Patrick Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Marilyn Scheer, .a lawyer in California, challenges California’s procedures for attorney discipline. Scheer argues that California violated her constitutional rights by not providing her meaningful judicial review in a fee dispute between herself and a client. She also asserts that the rules governing the California State Bar’s disciplinary procedures are facially unconstitutional. The State Bar responds that Scheer’s claims are meritless, and that in any event they are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and the statute of limitations for actions brought under…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Davis v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Larry Flynt v. Stephanie K. ShimazuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Corrine Thomas v. County of HumboldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Pacific Coast Horseshoeing v. Kimberly KirchmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- (PS) Engel v. Cantil-SakauyeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.