Legal Opinion

Wright v. Incline Village General Improvement District

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2011No. 10-16043PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

With few exceptions, Defendant-Appellee Incline Village General Improvement District (IVGID) only allows people who own or rent real property within IVGID’s 1968 boundaries to access beaches that it owns and operates. Plaintiff-Appellant Frank Wright (Wright), who is excluded from the beach because he does not live within the 1968 boundaries, argues that this policy is unconstitutional under the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted IVGID’s motion for summary judgment, and denied Wright’s motion…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. JP Morgan Chase Bank AccountCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Laki Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii, Department OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Ronald Fournier v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Spears v. Ariz. Bd. of RegentsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  5. Jeffrey Nielsen v. Ryan ThornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API