Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Winburn

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 4, 1936PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is a proceeding brought under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. It was initiated by three petitioning attorneys who represented next of kin and distributees of the estate of Michael Winburn who are entitled to take three-eighteenths of the intestate property. Dispute arose in the probate proceeding as to the construction of the will. The will was admitted and the question of construction reserved for determination by supplemental decree. The surrogate determined that the testator by its terms had made a valid and complete disposition of his entire estate. The Appellate…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In re the Estate of WeissmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. In Re Estate of MathesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. In Re the Will of WinburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of LounsberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GreatsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the General Guardianship of the Property & Estate of SalmNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. In re the Estate of GellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  5. In re BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API