Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Weissmann

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 7, 1930PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

It is indeed rare in a proceeding involving the construction of a will that the court is favored by the opulence of citations presented in this case. Unfortunately, much of the diligence of counsel in the search for testamentary phraseology resembling that in the will at bar, is inevitably lost labor, since, as has been repeatedly pointed out by all courts passing upon these questions, “ the citation of authorities is of very little use in cases of this kind upon the fundamental principles of the law of wills. All the authorities cited are a mere repetition of those rules. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of BumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. In re Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  4. Masterson v. . TownshendNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Weed v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of WeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of CorliesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. In re the Estate of ShupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API