United States v. Rosa Reyes-Meza De Polanco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant raises two points upon her appeal from her conviction for violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a (smuggling marihuana) : (1) The record does not adequately demonstrate that appellant’s waiver of her right to jury trial was freely and voluntarily made, and (2) Section 176a is unconstitutional as applied to appellant, because had she complied with the federal statutes that would have made her importation legal (the disclosure and registration statutes, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1459, 1461, 1481(a) (3), 26 U.S.C. §§ 4751-4755), she would have potentially incriminated herself under state laws penalizing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carl Gregory Witt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Edward Pool v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Charles E. Hatcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Amnon Saadya, United States of America v. Marco AbkasisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Dumas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Nova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.