Legal Opinion

United States v. Rosa Reyes-Meza De Polanco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1970No. 23239_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant raises two points upon her appeal from her conviction for violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a (smuggling marihuana) : (1) The record does not adequately demonstrate that appellant’s waiver of her right to jury trial was freely and voluntarily made, and (2) Section 176a is unconstitutional as applied to appellant, because had she complied with the federal statutes that would have made her importation legal (the disclosure and registration statutes, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1459, 1461, 1481(a) (3), 26 U.S.C. §§ 4751-4755), she would have potentially incriminated herself under state laws penalizing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Carl Gregory Witt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Edward Pool v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Charles E. Hatcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. David CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Amnon Saadya, United States of America v. Marco AbkasisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Dumas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Nova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API