Edward Pool v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
Appellant commenced his trial before a jury on four counts, two charging the concealment and two charging sale of two amounts of heroin. (21 U.S.C. § 174.) During this jury trial, the parties signed a stipulation of facts, and the case was thereafter tried by the judge. Appellant was found guilty on each count, and sentenced to ten years — five years on each count, counts three and four to run consecutively with one and two, respectively.
Two errors are alleged:(1) There was no valid waiver of jury as required by Rule 23(a).(2) The statutory presumption of § 174 created…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Frank Anthony Cellino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Wilbur Horne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Albert Agobian and Albert Egishian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Eric Charles Martin, A/K/A Mickey Milton ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- John Richard Bayless v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- State v. CrumpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- Boulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.