Legal Opinion

Edward Pool v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1965No. 19522PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

Appellant commenced his trial before a jury on four counts, two charging the concealment and two charging sale of two amounts of heroin. (21 U.S.C. § 174.) During this jury trial, the parties signed a stipulation of facts, and the case was thereafter tried by the judge. Appellant was found guilty on each count, and sentenced to ten years — five years on each count, counts three and four to run consecutively with one and two, respectively.

Two errors are alleged:(1) There was no valid waiver of jury as required by Rule 23(a).(2) The statutory presumption of § 174 created…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Frank Anthony Cellino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Wilbur Horne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Albert Agobian and Albert Egishian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric Charles Martin, A/K/A Mickey Milton ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. John Richard Bayless v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. State v. CrumpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. Boulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API