Yarnell v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action brought by a resident, and tax-payer, against the city of Los Angeles, M. D. Johnson, treasurer of said city, and the City Bank, a private corporation. The purpose of the action is to enjoin the said treasurer from depositing the public moneys of the city with said bank pursuant to a certain contract between the city and the bank. Defendants filed a general demurrer “that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” An answer and supplemental answer were filed, together with some affidavits, and the case was submitted. Subsequently, the…
2Cited by19 opinions
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Los Angeles v. TeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Banaz v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- San Diego County v. California Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.