Legal Opinion
John Deere Co. of Baltimore v. William C. Pahl Construction Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1969PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamone, J.
The defendant has moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a cause of action under CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) and the plaintiff has moved for summary judgment on its complaint pursuant to CPLR 3212.
On December 12, 1966 Ranalli Construction Inc. purchased a John Deere Model 350 Crawler Loader from the Melvin Tractor Equipment, Inc., under a time sale agreement. This contract was subsequently assigned to the plaintiff. Financing statements were filed with the Secretary of ¡State of the State of New York and the Onondaga County Clerk.
The defendant purchased the Crawler…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re PlattDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Beneficial Finance Co. v. Kurland Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968
- Bloch Bros. Paper Co. v. LarkinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Cushman Bakery and Cushman Baking Company. Appeal of Jacob Agger, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Thomas v. GoughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- In Re ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Kara Non Food Distributing Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Maremont Marketing, Inc. v. Centennial Industries, Inc. (In Re Centennial Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.