Legal Opinion
Beneficial Finance Co. v. Kurland Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 11, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, P. J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $969.90, predicated upon an aEeged conversion of an automobile upon which plaintiff claimed a security interest in the form of a financing statement.
The essential facts are not in dispute. On March 25, 1966 one Sheila Hardy of 162 Hempstead Boad, Spring VaEey, borrowed $800 from plaintiff for the stated purpose of purchasing a 1959 Cadillac automobEe bearing serial number 59 KO 91331. To obtain the loan she executed and delivered a promissory note for $969.90 payable to plaintiff and a security agreement (chattel mortgage) on the automobile,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- American City Bank of Tullahoma v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Southwest Bank of Omaha v. MoritzNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
- Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc. v. Kurland Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- John Deere Co. of Baltimore v. William C. Pahl Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1969
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Kara Non Food Distributing Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.