Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Harkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 2005No. 9601-60693; A122370PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Husband appeals from a judgment modifying a 1997 dissolution judgment that awarded spousal support to wife by extending its duration for an indefinite period of time. ORS 107.135 (2001).1 We conclude that the trial court lacked authority to order indefinite support under the circumstances of this case and reverse.

The 1997 judgment provided that husband’s spousal support obligation would end on November 30, 2002. The parties agree that husband paid the final support installment required by the 1997 judgment on October 15, 2002, and that, at that time, no obligation existed under judgment. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spady v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In re the Marriage of ParkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. In re Marriage of WoitaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. In re Marriage of WrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of GoertelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. In re StansellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API