Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Woita

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 1989No. D-7298; CA A50591PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Husband appeals and wife cross-appeals the trial court’s modification order, by which husband was directed to pay wife spousal support of $330 per month. We agree with husband that the trial court had no authority to impose the support obligation, and we reverse in part.

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1976. The judgment provided:

“[Husband] shall pay to [wife] as and for alimony the sum of $300 per month commencing April 1,1976, and payable on the first day of each month thereafter until [wife’s] death, remarriage or until such time as this court shall determine that [wife] has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McFarlane v. McFarlaneOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In re Marriage of PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In re the Marriage of ParkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of WrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. In re the Marriage of HarkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. In re StansellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API