In re the Marriage of Goertel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
HARGREAVES, S. J.
The issue in this case is whether the motion and order to show cause regarding modification of spousal support filed by wife in this dissolution proceeding was timely filed. For the reasons set forth below, we find that it was not and affirm the trial court’s decision awarding summary judgment in favor of husband.
The facts are not in dispute. The judgment of dissolution of marriage between the parties required husband to pay spousal support in the sum of $500 per month to wife for 24 months, commencing on November 1, 2003, with the final payment due on October 1, 2005. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spady v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Hansen v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- In re the Marriage of HarkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re StansellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018