Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Wrench

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1989No. D8405-63416; CA A50422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court dismissed wife’s motion to modify the spousal support provision of the dissolution judgment on the ground that the motion was untimely. Wife appeals, and we affirm.

Paragraph 3 of the judgment provides:

“ [Husband] shall pay to [wife] for her support the sum of $600 per month, to be paid into a bank account opened by [wife] in her own name, commencing with the payment not later than the first day of May, 1985 and continuing on the same day of each month thereafter until, and including, October 1, 1988, or the death of petitioner, whichever shall first occur.”

Husband made the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ParkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. In re Marriage of WoitaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of HarkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Evitt v. EvittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. In re StansellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API