Legal Opinion

Bertges v. Armour & Co. of Delaware

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1942No. Appeal, 208PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This judgment must be reversed because of an error on the part of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, followed on appeal by the court below, in applying section 484 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 4, 1937, P. L. 1552.

The claimant was injured on January 5, 1935. An open agreement of compensation for total disability was entered into and compensation was paid under it until November 9, 1935, when he returned to work, at his usual wages; and on November 26, 1935 he executed a final receipt. The section of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, governing the setting aside…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seneca v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Mancini v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Matkosky v. Midvale CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Uglaky v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Hartman v. Pennsylvania Salt Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Benko v. Vesta Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Ruby v. HutchisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Silsley v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API