Legal Opinion

Matkosky v. Midvale Company

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1940No. Appeal, 230PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This appeal by the employer in a workmen’s compensation case is from a judgment entered in the court below upon an award made upon the theory that the claimant-appellee sustained, in the course of his employment on October 5, 1937, an accidental injury to the distal phalange of his right thumb which entitled him, under the provisions of Section 306(c) of our Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, 77 PS §513, to compensation at the rate of $15 per week for a period of thirty weeks for the “loss of the first phalange…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Seneca v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Overmiller v. D. E. Horn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. City of Hazleton v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Kennedy v. Holmes Const. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Vince v. Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Chubb v. Allegheny Country ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API