Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Rader

Appellee recovered judgment on a complaint, in two paragraphs, for stock killed.

The only points made by appellant’s counsel are that the court erred in overruling its motions to modify the judgment, and for a new trial.

The foundation of each motion is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the finding upon the second paragraph, because there is not shown, between the Midland Railway Company, by whose engine the injury was inflicted, and the appellant, any such connection as would *608make the appellant liable for the acts of the Midland company.

Filed Oct. 9, 1894.

To enable us to determine…