Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Goodspeed

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 10, 1937No. 13,891PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE parties appear here as in the district court and will be designated as plaintiff and defendants. Plaintiff as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Clayton R. Morrison, sued the defendants, who were officers and directors of M. E. Traylor and Company, Inc., an investment company, for damages for alleged fraud and deceit in the sale of certain corporate stock to her husband in his lifetime. From a judgment rendered on a jury verdict adverse to her she prosecutes error.

The undisputed facts in the case are substantially as follows: M. E. Traylor and Company were engaged in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sellar v. ClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  2. Wheeler v. DunnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Pullen v. HeadbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Kunzmann v. PetteysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. M.D.C./Wood, Inc. v. MortimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API