Legal Opinion · Dissent

Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, Llc

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2012No. 10-0950Published

1DissentJustice Johnson

The Court, focusing on a report by Av-inger’s appraisal expert David Bolton that was not introduced into evidence at trial, concludes “[i]t is apparent that Bolton was not valuing the 23.79 acres improved by the pipeline infrastructure that Avinger lost, but rather the gas processing facility that Enbridge Pipelines gained,” and his testimony “impermissibly focused on the benefit to Enbridge Pipelines in avoiding the cost of removing the plant.” 386 S.W.3d at 263. I disagree that Bolton’s testimony supports the Court’s statement. I also disagree that the trial court abused its discretion by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Fort Worth v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. City of Dallas v. RashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Enbridge Pipeline (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API