Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Rash

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1964No. 16303PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

In the exercise of its right of eminent domain (Art. 1109, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.) the ■City of Dallas instituted condemnation proceedings to take for pipeline purposes 8.2 acres of land out of a 210 acre tract of land in Van Zandt County, Texas belonging to the appellees. Prior to the taking of this land appellees had subdivided this property into lots. The property taken by the City •coincided with 38 lots leaving other lots both to the north and south of the pipeline. The title taken by appellant is that of a fee simple title, with the exception of the oil, gas and other…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. RubyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. United States v. 158.76 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in the Town of Townshend, Windham County, State of Vermont, and Janet Hoadley JacquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Uehlinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Fuller v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Haley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 CO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API