Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. Corbin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1974No. B-3956PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Justice.

This is a condemnation case. The question: at what time does the landowners’ compensation cease to benefit from the rise of area land values due to the very project for which their land is being taken? The trial court and Court of Civil Appeals have allowed the jury to value the condemned land by including enhancement due to the new facility until that date when the landowners are given personal notice that their land is to be included in the project. 491 S.W.2d 468. We hold this to be error, because it allows the compensation to exceed the standard of the fair market value…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of Dallas v. ShackelfordTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Aycock v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hooks v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Caffe Ribs, Incorporated v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Heddin v. Delhi Gas Pipeline CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Collin County v. Hixon Family Partnership, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API