Legal Opinion

Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police Department

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 25, 1998No. 2CA-CV 97-0182PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This case raises issues concerning the interplay between Arizona’s Public Records Law, A.R.S. §§ 39-121 to 39-125, and Arizona common law relating to discovery of police records in the course of litigation. 1 Defendants/appellants, the Tucson Police Department (TPD) Custodian of Records and the City of Tucson (collectively the City), appeal from the trial court’s judgment ordering the City to produce certa’" public records and awarding attorney’s fees to plaintifi/appellee John Bolm. In a cross-appeal, Bolm challenges the trial court’s partial denial of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Carlson v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. MAG v. Division of ABCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Griffis v. Pinal CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Romero v. Southwest AmbulanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Capital City Press, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API