Legal Opinion

Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 1980No. 79SA349PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

This is an original proceeding brought under C.A.R. 21. The petitioners seek a writ prohibiting the respondent district court from enforcing discovery of certain files and reports maintained by the Denver Police Department, and requiring the court to enter a protective order precluding such discovery. In the alternative, the petitioners seek a writ requiring the respondent court, before it enforces discovery, to conduct an in camera examination and to excise from the files and reports materials asserted to be beyond the scope of discovery. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Flanagan v. MungerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Loigman v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Civil Service Commission v. PinderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. McDonald v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API