Legal Opinion

Furman v. Delaware Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 19, 2011No. 203, 2011PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice:

Jeffrey Furman (“Furman”), the plaintiff-below, appeals from a Superior Court order dismissing his complaint against the defendant-below, Delaware Department of Transportation (“DelDOT”) on the ground that sovereign immunity barred the action. On appeal, Furman argues that the trial court improperly dismissed the complaint, because the court relied upon an affidavit extrinsic to the complaint, without affording him an opportunity for discovery. Because the Superior Court considered matters outside the pleadings, it erred by applying the Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss standard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Appriva Shareholder Litigation Co. v. Ev3, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. Vanderbilt Income & Growth Associates, L.L.C. v. Arvida/JMB Managers, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. CatesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Ramirez v. MurdickSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Doe 30's Mother v. BradleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. 326 Associates LP v. Progressive Services IncSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. Antoinette Marconi and Roy Marconi v. Brandywine Chrysler Jeep, Inc.Delaware Court of Common Pleas · 2014
  4. Athene Life and Annuity Company v. American General Life Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
  5. Bowman v. State of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API