Ramirez v. Murdick
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice:
Plaintiff-Appellant Hermilo Ramirez filed a Huffman claim 1 seeking liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees and costs for the late payment of Worker’s Compensation benefits. He appeals the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees, Jeremy Murdick, M & A Construction, Inc. and M & A Construction (the “Employer”). The Superior Court determined that the remedies under 19 Del. C. § 2357 did not apply because the default in payment was less than thirty days from when the benefits were due to be paid.
Ramirez makes two arguments on appeal. First, he…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- In Re General Motors (Hughes) Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- In Re Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Oceanport Industries, Inc. v. Wilmington Stevedores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Appriva Shareholder Litigation Co. v. Ev3, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Furman v. Delaware Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Dambro v. MeyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Sagarra Inversiones, S.L. v. Cementos Portland Valderrivas, S.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Verrastro v. Bayhospitalists, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.