Legal Opinion

Doe 30's Mother v. Bradley

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 29, 2012No. C.A. Nos. N10C-05-023 JRS, N10C-10-317 JRSPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlights, J.

I

Notwithstanding an emerging trend to the contrary, in Delaware, a plaintiff still must establish that a defendant owed her a duty of care in order to state a prima facie claim of negligence.1 Regardless of how morally, ethically or socially deplorable a defendant’s conduct may be viewed by other constituencies, in the eyes of the law, the defendant may not be held to answer in negligence unless and until the court determines, as a matter of law, that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plain*437tiff. This is and should remain the law of Delaware.

This opinion marks the second occasion the…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Central Mortgage Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  5. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. McCants v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  2. Jane Doe 30's Mother v. BradleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2012
  3. A&D Complete Services & Landscaping, LLC v. Horsepower Property Maintenance LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2026
  4. Abdur Rahaman v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. Barnes v. Hooper and Harrington Raceway, Inc. d/b/a Harrington Raceway & CasinoSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API